Wingspan Board Game Review – Stonemaier Games

Wingspan Board Game Review – Stonemaier Games

So let’s start with a confession. I’ve always been impressed with the way the Jamey Stegmaier runs Stonemaier games. From his initial success with Kickstarter, to his continual support of the community, his fundraising, his openness to talk about his own life and experiences. Like every endeavour, there’s been missteps along the way and not every game that is part of the Stonemaier portfolio can be considered as much of a classic to me as Viticulture or Scythe. However, he continues to be one of these dependable voices trying to do the right thing. When Wingspan became a thing I was one of the first people to interview the designer Elizabeth Hargrave. , we spoke about her game before it literally stormed everywhere like a tidal wave and went on to sell over 1.6 million copies. (You should give it a listen, Elizabeth is a fascinating person to speak with) Now four years later, I finally sat down and try to figure out what the fuss was about. I’m not expecting this review to influence anyone’s buying decision, but as one of the most successful games in the last five years, it would almost be rude to not play it and put together my thoughts.



Wingspan is an engine building game based around birds in North America. As you play, you’ll add cards to your own area that will allow you to increase resources, expand your collection of birds, eggs and food, and ultimately increase the number of victory points that you’ll score at the end of the game. At the beginning your turns will involve a minimum number of actions but by the end of the game, you’ll have less turns but more to do in each turn.


Wingspan is all about adding to your tableau in order to increase the number effects that occur when you take a particular action. Primarily you’ll be trying to place a bird from your hand (which is better than two in the bush) in the three rows of your tableau which are split into three types of terrain. Play a bird and place it in the matching habitat, paying the food cost. Some of the birds will have activation effects that occur when you take the primary action of that row. The very top row doesn’t have any space for playing a card, but it has the playing action, where you’ll pay eggs to play cards. The three rows underneath allow you to gather food from the birdfeeder, collect eggs to be added to bird cards, or draw new bird cards from the selection tray or draw pile. you’ll place a token in the row of the action you want to play on the most empty left space and then move your token over the cards in that row, activating any actions that the cards offer. Some of the actions might allow extra food, others will allow you to store food on the card, or even add other bird cards under that card for later scoring. Every action that you take is going towards that final point salad goal and it’s extremely rare for you to not be taking an action that adds more digits as you go. The round continues until all of your actions tokens have been used, and then a bonus is rewarded based on particular random criteria. In a such a clever mechanic, you then leave one of your action tokens to mark how you performed on the bonus reward, thus leaving you with one less action for the next round. After you’ve completed all four rounds, then you’ll get into final scoring where you’ll be awarded points for pretty much everything that you’ve built up on the board.


Once you reach the final round, you’ll total up all the points based on the value of each bird card, stored cards, stored food and the winner is the player with the most points. 


It’s not that Wingspan looks overly lovely, it’s just that Stonemaier really cared to make this game look as good as it could with those little touches that show they appreciate you as a gamer. They knew what was going to have players oohing and aahing and demanding others to come over and look at these ickle cute eggs. The dice tower bird feeder is the welcome overproduction that you didn’t realise that you needed. The chunky size of the food dice that feel almost edible and clunky in your hand. The inclusion of the small trays to put the tokens in. The inclusion of the bigger tray to make sure the bird cards behave themselves. The pretend eggs that you are definitely going to smell in public and definitely going to try to taste when you think no one is looking. Those bird cards. There’s something endearing about all those illustrations, all the work that has went in to make them look as real as they do. You’ll loudly comment with glee when you see the cute duck ready to be picked and played. The iconography is clear and obvious and makes remembering what you are meant to be doing extremely simple. There seems to be a genuine effort to make the visuals and production work alongside the gameplay so that they work in a meaningful symbiosis. So while it looks like there’s too much, once you get playing you realise it’s there for a purpose.



Experience tells you that when you want someone to learn your game then you make it as easy as possible for them to learn your game. If it means that you take the time to create a player turn guide for four players to give them examples on what they should play for their first couple of turns, then that’s what you do. This is exactly what has been done here, with a well laid out rulebook, actual turn examples and a full glossary that explains everything you need to know how to play a game. Where a lot of games fall on their face when it comes to the teach, Stonemaier’s experience with previous games shines here and even when faced with playing with the full five players, everyone was up and running pretty quickly without the need to continually check the rulebook while we were playing.


Depending on the number of players, you’ll probably spend between one to two hours playing through a game, and this increases due to the lack of simultaneous play during rounds. In the final rounds while you’ll have less turns, there’s a chance the analysis paralysis might kick in and that has a chance of increasing the game length.

Final Thoughts

Like watching any well renowned TV show, or classic movie, or trying a famous restaurant, or that fresh new album from one of the greats, Wingspan is one of those games you need to experience in order to tick it off the to do list, even if its just to see what the fuss is about. It lands doing a superhero landing, with a set up that doesn’t hope you’ve learned how to play, but insists on taking you by the hand before licking a handkerchief and making sure its wiped that bit of dirt off of your face. The production values are solid, practical and walk that tightrope between overproduction and practical usefulness. Wingspan is very easy to learn and also allows players to become consciously competent within the first couple of rounds. There’s touches here that can only come from experience within the game design world. The decrease in the number of actions you can take in a round works so well to balance up the increase in time you are going to be taking as you build your engine. The dice reroll mechanic when you have the same type of food result helps to prevent bottlenecks for that particular action. Has anyone who has reviewed this not mentioned the eggs at least two or three times in their appraisal? I doubt it.

Though I do have some counterweight coconuts to these European praise swallows. While Wingspan has picked up this mantel of being the industry darling as the game you can get new players to play, I’m not convinced it is the game you should be rocking on to the table as soon as your friends mention they wouldn’t mind trying ‘one of those games you’ve been asking us to play’. There’s a lot to be casting your eye over during the game and as it reaches the point where you’ve several cards in your tableau, then it can become analysis paralysis central. That might be something that will make less experienced players tap out once the real engine building kicks in. For those who like engine builders and like to be able to plan their strategy, you’re often playing a game of damage limitation, with blind card drawing and a lack of planning becoming clearer as the game progresses. Sometimes you’ll be playing a card because you need to increase the resources you gain when you play a particular row, even though the card you’re laying down is sub optimal. I would have preferred a larger pick of cards rather than the three on offer as the game stands. There’s a lack of negative player interaction that certainly made itself felt at higher player numbers. There was never really a way to impede someone from creating a monster machine that would score them big at the end game. In fact, there were a few times in which a player would be offering resources to other players as part of their bird card activation. While there was subtle interaction through the card choice and bird feeder, it was lacking the got you vibe that is present in the likes of Viticulture. You don’t really know how well you’re doing against everyone else until you’ve finished the game and that is unlikely to change on both second, fifth and even tenth game. In many ways Wingspan is like four people all reading the same book at the same time and stopping to share their thoughts at the end of a chapter. However, there wasn’t anyone around that table that night that said they didn’t enjoy it. There wasn’t anyone who wouldn’t want to play it again and that in itself is pretty special.

Wingspan does that most excellent thing of making you play something with layers that looks complicated, but never makes you feel stupid while you play it. You’ll stop and contemplate and mutter and curse yourself when you’ve played the wrong card or rolled the wrong dice. But there’s nothing quite like it when you get to the end game and you’re activating one bird after another, laying eggs, chucking out food and tucking away birds and feeling just like your having the best time. Wingspan lives up to its hype with feathers on..

Any Tips?

Get your birds down as quickly as you can, and make sure you have enough food to pay for at least two to give you a good start.

Designer – Elizabeth Hargrave   


This review is based on the retail version of the game provided to us by the designer and publisher. We were not paid for this review. We give a general overview of the gameplay and so not all of the mechanical aspects of the game may be mentioned.

The majority of the games that we are play are going to take a reasonable number of sessions and playthroughs to fully understand every possibility that they offer. We hope this write up gives you an idea of whether or not this game is something that you will consider playing or even add to your collection. Our Six Degrees of Expectation have been written to make it easier for you to find out what is important to you as a player. Even if we don’t like something, hopefully it helps you to decide if it is something that you should find out more about. We always suggest you check out a gameplay video to give you a better understanding of the game as it is played. 

If you would like to support more written pieces on the blog then please consider backing us on Patreon.